And I like the grainy renderings for some scenes.Live View. Image: Leica. This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! As mentioned, one of the big selling points Leica hung their marketing angle off when launching the Leica M262 was the reduction of menu options to 2 screens compared to the M240. Now, if the shutter was fully mechanical and cocked by hand that would be a very different thing. Thanks!These new Nikons look fairly amazing I do wish theyd been quicker to market though!M10 review I guess it depends on how much it inspires a post out of me its the first new Leica Digital camera Ive ever bought, and with it being new/current, I might try and squeeze something out sooner rather than later. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. homestead high school staff. Forget is a strong word. The obvious take-away from the third image set is just how poorly the Leica M246 and Leica M Monochrom renders overexposed highlights. A few years later I sold all my Nikon DLSR kit and switched to Sony full frame A7 cameras and began to realise just how useful it can be. Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). Turns out that was bollocks too! Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. By https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. Its still inaccurate, but at least the photos look pleasant enough. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . M-E "CCD" M9 M9-P CCD. Everything is very tactile. It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). With sensor shift, the image sensor (rather than the lens) moves to counterbalance any vibration of the camera. Damn digital cameras I can control film camera GAS quite well these days, but these digital buggers still get me! Literally. The higher the movie recording bitrate the better the movie quality with more and crispier details and less compression artifacts. I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. But, when my M262 needed to go to German camera hospital for what I guessed might be a significant amount of time (as is often the case), I figured I had little to loose trying out an M240 for a few weeks/months. I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. I just picked up a Leica M-P Typ 240 to compliment my new M9-P I bought a couple weeks ago. You have to ask yourself, . Ive had it for a month now. Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. I was even contemplating selling my Leica lenses and the M3 as well, but I love using that film M system (and film photography) so much that I could not do it (at least not yet)! Edit: Since writing this I have been made aware that pressing and holding the ISO button is the quickest way to change ISO. The following dropbox link to a small group of images hopefully illustrate these subtle but apparent colour densities. That said, I dont shoot Leicas for rapidity.Start Up. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write speeds. If not, get the 262. I guess its only really there as it was the most logical thing for Leica to put there in place of the LV live view button on the M240. This has all the advantages of shooting raw, while taking up much less storage space. To make pictures, those are good bodies to be used with good lens. Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. Your previous content has been restored. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. Ive had it for years and purchased it when M8s were at their lowest prices. The latter requires the lens to have 6-bit coding or manual setting of the lens in the main menu. I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. Its marquee features are omissions rather than additions: the M-D doesn't . . !if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_13',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); One way or another, in the time Ive been using the camera, Ive not got used to this little issue, though I have at least learned to live with it. Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. I use along the two M240/262/etc. Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. The better screen, slightly improved interface and even fairly small things like the artificially lit frame lines introduced in the M240 made the the camera feel more mature. And if you find the viewfinder better, as many report. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. A simple exterior is my kind of camera- adverts belong on billboards, not on cameras. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. Very interesting. Cheers! If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. The M262 was not available when I bought my my M240 but if I was buying now I would still go for the M240. The wider width of the M240 has never bothered me but the new M10 does look good a little slimmed down. Selling the M262, a camera that I purchased for its pure simplicity; and keeping the Z6, a camera that I purchased for its many features (including live view, a hybrid camera with fantastic video capabilities including full frame 4K, compatibility with my Profoto strobes, owning quite a bit of Nikon F-mount glass, auto-focus, etc.)! As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. I completely agree about the thumb rest, adds more (in a bad way) than removing the screen takes away, in my opinion. I was wondering if you ever ended up upgrading to the M10? One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. Your link has been automatically embedded. Clear editor. That alone justifies the decision to buy. With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. So as I said in the first few paragraphs, now its on its way out, I thought I should do it the justice of writing a few parting words about it. High quality battery charger is a handy companion for digital shooting. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. November 7, 2013 December 8, 2013 Peter . Some cards are woefully slow. On the Leica M262 the thumb dial can be set to control exposure compensation. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. Since most reviews are quite large in content thanks to extensive coverage, comparisons to other cameras and large sample images, they span across multiple pages for easier reading experience. You'd be wise to buy the best/latest digital body you can afford and leave a healthy budget for the best/most lenses possible. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Mostly because of the need for a screen that I allude to. Im really glad I ordered it, the best Leica M camera Ive ever used! We have the top best product and truth reviews that will help make your decision easy. I have looked into all three cameras and all seem like perfectly great cameras . This thing has live-view, and video. I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. Loomis77December 27, 2020 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). Hi everyone. The last four images you posted are the best images Ive seen from an M240. BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. Then out of curiosity, I've bough at fair price ( sh price dropped when M10 came, I couldn't resist) former digital Ms (M240, M-D, M246). Thanks for the insights Louis! It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? By It only having felt right once in 6 months felt wrong. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Expanded ISO allows you to go beyond the native ISO. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! Material choices as well as the overall fit and finish are second to none. By comparison, the Leica M240 had a lot of features many of which, as Ive alluded to, were seen by some as not needed on a Leica M rangefinder. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. A fetish with the M10 is its simplified menu. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. Have a read of this for tips. My first surprise was as any Leica M240 user would likely tell you just how familiar it felt. dslr . I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. All images generated with the M262 + 24mm 3.8 were taken July 6 between 3 and 5 PM around Victoria, BC in direct overhead sunlight (far from ideal), https://www.dropbox.com/sh/borvrgwfsovpoiz/AADvQ-IsxTfl51btqaCD_i4Fa?dl=0. Another M10 fetish. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more space. I will stick with my film Leica for now. Very nice work. It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. Thirty days, a new sensor, a new shutter mechanism, and a couple other tweaks and the camera was better than new. In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. As such, the Leica M262 is possibly better seen as a sidestep rather than a step forward in the Leica lineup. I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. Let's try another side by side Leica Monochrom - 50 Lux - click for larger and crop - Leica M 240 - click for larger. My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone. Really thats been the beauty of the Leica M262 for me for the most part, its done almost exactly what Ive needed it to. I have both and haven't noticed any difference but I haven't done a side by side comparison. I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. I keep looking at the 262 as a hidden gem. Hence, I literally could not give a single poop what Para thinks . Possibly Leica got the Bayer filter from a different supplier making the change needed. Quick charge with automatic constant current control prevents battery from overcharging, short circuit, and electronic shock I took the M240 because it offeres live view. I didnt discover this, despite that being how the M9 works. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. It was at this early stage that I noticed the first thing that has continued to make me scratch my head throughout the time I used the camera. But even then, its not close to other modern cameras. M262 can be more pleasing in use as lighter with longer lasting battery and a bit quieter than M240. A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. Thanks for posting, enjoyed the images. Unfortunately, there are elements of the way the ISO modes work that have slightly bothered me.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_13',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); To be fair, the auto ISO is really well implemented. Its a good thing to have for visually challenged oldsters like me. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. If you like aluminium choose the M262, if you prefer brass go for the M240. I know this is an old article but so what, I m commenting anyways. I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. Keep up the good words! As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. This can make the process of rationalising an upgrade quite difficult, though in my experience once the upgrade is made, it does tend to make a bit more sense. In practice, this has translated into me being able to shoot it for a lot longer without having to think about changing or charging the battery. I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. By continuing to browse our site, you agree to our use of cookies. . And thats pushing it. I didnt have the energy to get into the subtleties of all that here though, LV is useful even if the screen does not move. Its funny, the M262 seems to be the Leica camera that people forget. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. I think I am veering towards the M262 with the Voigtlander Ultron35mm. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. The device is dustproof and water-resistant. Leica M9 vs. M240; M240: More Thoughts; Leica M240: Final Verdict; Leica M9 sharpness vs. Sony RX1R, Nikon D800E, Fuji X100s; My camera of the year for 2013; Related. M-D, M-P, M240 and M262 photos. I cant tell you how relieved I was about this I know that probably sounds daft, but my Leica rangefinders are default cameras that I rely on when I want to shoot without any thought to the camera. Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. Sadly, that is the way of digital cameras my friend, a never-ending hamster wheel of upgrades. Hmm I wonder if you might be right there. Its. They didn't say it's a different sensor, they said different technology. Something about the idea that it had all these weird and wonderful features made me expect a camera that felt different. So I am very glad I got the 240 version. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. BECOME A MEMBER to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMbqwh98qO5wWowtQjIK8ig/joinEXCLUSIVE PRESETS FOR IMAGES CAPTURED WITH LEICA CAMERAS:. The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. Leica M262 M-P M10 M262 Leica M-E . Same lens, same settings - desaturated during RAW conversion. The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Given my choice to upgrade to the M10, possibly the most pertinent issue with the ISO settings is the inability to set or see the chosen ISO without pressing a button and looking at the back of the camera. Aluminium body makes is nice and light. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. It uses a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor with a near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. Interesting article as I picked up a used m240 at Christmas at a good price. I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. There is an M240 feature that can get you there with User Settings, and right now I cant recall how easily accessible that is.In Camera BW filter Simulations. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. To begin with, I tried put the idea to the back of my mind, then one day I opened the cupboard a saw my Monochrom sat there looking underused.
Harris County Judicial Candidates 2022,
Otsego High School Staff,
Juliana Stratton Husband,
How Tall Is Linguini From Ratatouille,
Articles L