Generally, prime lenses have a reputation for being slightly sharper, and I have found that to be true whether I am shooting a nebula or a Scarlet Tanager. KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. I mainly use for head shot photography. Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. Exposure uniformity (vignetting) is also really excellent, reaching a maximum of 1/4 EV (on a camera with an APS-C size sensor) at f/2, and dropping to well under 1/10 EV at f/2.8 and above. Far from being a generic run-of-the-mill image hosting website, it was created and is still operated by an astrophotographer, and boasts features that are very specific to astrophotography. Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. (purchased for $900), reviewed April 15th, 2011 Another example is the 100mm (or sometimes 90mm) F2.8 macro lens. He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. It's terrible. While some people LOVE the bokeh circles (first photo), others hate them and consider them a distraction.The 50mm f/1.8 is hardly a lens to talk about. Bond, I expect you to buy! The clip-in Astronomik 12nm Ha is one of their most popular filters ever and for good reason! It always happens to me with Samyang, it makes good glasses, fast and sharp, I want to have them, but they are not comfortable to use, not in Sony E, their focus is not precise, and they are not "so" cheap. Canon 300/4 ED IF AF (non-IS) Nothing just makes sense about the review -- the writer does not really understand the lens he is reviewing, very basic concepts are wrong. You will see why. If you buy a nifty fifty or a 100mm macro lens you simply cannot go wrongyou will get a great and handy lens for your money, with great image quality. Large emission nebulae like the California Nebula (pictured below) are a great choice for this focal length. (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 I would only recommend this lens for casual photographers where missed shot means nothing. Really like the large focusing ring. Lots of wet blankets around here. Build quality: excellent. This is so annoying that I intend to replace the Canon lens cap with a Tamron cap. Unfortunately I haven't more the Canon lens. Backwards compatible (film). Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. If you aren't completely set on the 135mm, the 200mm f/2.8L is a fantastic lens and i think its less expensive than the 135mm f/2L. Juksu, your point is well taken. don't get me wrong; this lens will take great photos, but the 'flatness' i was getting in my photos nearly had me give up 25 years of hobby photography. For some reason Samyang makes lenses nobody is asking for. Is it possible to get good results on a Baader filter modifed Canon 450D and a good telephoto lens, or do I need to get a good APO? Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. After several years off, the venerable magazine has held a public open call photo contest and selected nine finalists and one winning image for its 'Photos of the Year.'. (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 Preaching to the choir! f/2, fast-accurate-silent focus, (relatively) small & light, super sharp!! And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). Wonderful, smooth bokeh. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. Must have if you're serious about portraits. Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? The colder temperatures will make DSLR astrophotography much more practical, and there are plenty of great targets to choose from. Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . Although your target audience is beginning DSLR imagers, much of your advice also applies to using lenses with CCD cameras. Still, what a time to be an enthusiast/photog, so many nice options. Why take a step back from 250 to sit between the RedCat and the 24-105? I have taken some of the coolest photos with this lens on a canon mark III which shoots ten frames per second. About 3 hours of exposures split between Narrowband, Broadband and short exposure shots to make an HDR image. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej Thanks, Chris, hi Trevor my name is sagar i have same lens but i have one question why lot of stars are appearing in my image which is taken thru rokinon 135mm, Your email address will not be published. With a good smartphone, some creative legwork, and the photos scaled down as they are in this article you can make photos that at least just as good. Perhaps I missed it, but did you use a clip-in light pollution filter with your 60D and this lens? In an effort to save money, Id like to start using a Canon 80D that we already own to start picking targets and imaging. So, for Joe User or especially for Jane Client, one really has to look closely to see much of a difference. Another drawback is the focal length. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. Instead it means the style of rendering. But do some experimenting before you decide. Were those taken with the Canon telephotos you spoke of, and the full spectrum modified camera and the clip in filter? f1.4 was a necessisty rather than a creative luxury. Nice image, andysea. The diameter of the lens is 77mm, with a non-rotating filter mount on the objective lens. Yes, there is some sharpness added when stopping down to f4 or f5.6 but after that it doesn't get better. From my purchase research, I found a consensus that stopping down optimizes sharpness but the diaphragm will make nine diffraction spikes when stopped down. This creates an effective focal length of roughly 200mm, a useful magnification for a wide variety of astro-imaging scenarios. Also, as creative as the wide-field 135mm focal length is, its not practical for smaller DSOs and most galaxies. Tack sharp at f/2. It is harder work than using a zoom lens, and some shots I just cannot get at all (cannot get close enough, or far enough way) but the shots I do get are so much nicer looking than I get with any other lens that for me and my goals it is a fair trade off. Would it at all be possible to at least make sure the people you publish know a little bit about photography? To see even more example photos using the Rokinon 135mm lens (or Samyang branded version), go ahead a perform a search on Astrobin or Flickr, with the appropriate filter. When I got home and loaded the photo into Lightroom I was blown away by two things. I would! @juksu - you're such a hypocrite. Another article that I read only the headline and saw a couple of samples then jumped directly to comments. @ Juksu - you're pathologically clueless. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. These lenses can be had on eBay in mint condition for around $70, and are probably the most price efficient optical instrument in the world. fast, sharp wide open, excellent bokeh, value for money, very fast, sharp, gorgeous background blur, world class lens. To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. Latter looks quite professional.. With this lens you don't need to do much if any post processing. From my experience, the toughest test on a lense is its ability to function wide open. The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. But like a glitch in the matrix, an anomaly that shouldn't exist, you can get the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm for as little as $430 brand new. Manual focus on wide angle lens, for landscapes, ok, if you have a reliable manual focus system, which Samyang, at least in my mount, does not have. I bought this lens after reading your great review for my Nikon D5300. But in the rush to make hybrids why are aren't we giving video shooters the tools they need? This is one of my all time favourites. Thanks Gary! RATING. IS would also help outside with wind. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. http://www.idyll.com/laneysat f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. I like fast lenses, and my Nikkor 105DC is my favourite. The inset picture is a magnified view of the bottom right corner of the frame. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. This is a very practical way to plan your next astrophotography project, and especially handy when using a wide field lens like the Rokinon 135mm F/2. 200mm Astrobin photos (not taken by me): https://www.astrobin.m USM F2.8 L II Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. Today I want to talk about another such lens design: The 135mm F2 lens. its useful to keep in mind these bokeh circles are the result of light sources bright lamps from autos Christmas lights streetlamps etc and are seriously overused in articles on lenses with strong subject\ backround seperations, they approach parody in the way they characterise subject separation, for most purposes and in most portrait situations its less highlight dominant backrounds that grace a photo. If you want the best value possible for your money, and can survive without autofocus, buy the Samyang. Geometric distortion is lower than one would expect, at 0.15% pincushion maximum, with an average of 0.07%. It turns out that this. (purchased for $725), reviewed March 26th, 2013 (purchased for $650), reviewed June 6th, 2008 The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. These are affordably available on eBay, and result in perfectly round star images, the way nature intended them to be. For example, the legendary Canon 85mm F1.2L weighs in at 1025g, and the Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art isn't too light either at 1130g. The original poster is right that it was a compromise though and stopping down was necessary for critical sharpness and a better image. For comparison, no other lens I know of would earn more than 8/10. The lens came in a handsome box, with core specifications and a lens construction diagram printed on the side. It's a technical review about a couple of lens attributes. Also, I used to have a Nikon 180/2.8 ED IF AF and 300/4 ED IF AF. The reason the 135mm lens was that it was the longest lens that would focus with a Leica rangefinder. Maybe try a 400mm f/2.0 to see it that one's got enough blur. (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 I got mine for $60.00 on Craigslist but seen them on eBay for $100 and less all the time. http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/01/canon-135mm-f2l-usm-mini-review.html One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. The only thing that could possibly make this better would be to add IS. So I feel I'm being cheated. Using the lens's diaphragm interferes with the light path and results in diffraction spikes which I find unattractive. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. I love the lens for my modified Sony a6000! I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. It is fantastic on my old 5d. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count.So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix). She's cold? With weather sealing this would be a 10. (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 It has just a hint of chromatic aberration on very bright stars and, if highly enlarged by 400-800%, the stars in the very corners barely begin to show a touch of astigmatism. Adam007,"a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels"No thanks. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. Since i am totally new in this field, i would like to start with astrophotography but using my existing camera (Fuji XT-30). A con is that it really makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. Have not used a 70-200 since. Even if the background is very close to your subject, somehow the optical construction in the 135mm lens will still manage to separate the background beautifully. Overall, spectacular lens. My canon is clear modded and I use a an Astronomik EOS-clip L filter to block the uv and ir. Really excels as indoor sports lens on a crop camera. In the highest contrast situations there's a hint of both purple and green fringing but both are minor and easy to remove with software. A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. lol, nice images, and i nearly bought this lens myself a few years ago. [emailprotected]. I shoot dozens of weddings every year but the 135mm stayed in my bag a majority of the time; I just didn't find myself needing to use it. Thanks! One of my very best lenses! I've owned nice SLR gear since 1976, and am normally a wide angle shooter this is my favorite lens, of all time. It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. Thanks for the fine article and the thought you put into it. While there are certainly pricey 135mm F2 lenses out there (such as the aforementioned Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art, or the Carl Zeiss 135mm) there are a couple that give you extreme value for the money. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. The Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 was the first lens I had ever used like this, and these aspects do not hinder the astrophotography experience whatsoever. My Rokinon 135F2 on my crop body is fun to play with.. a budget lens with budget construction on a discontinued camera system.. but hey im just a ham and egger https://flic.kr/p/21nj82V, I had a Canon 135/2 for a while, but I decided I preferred the 100 L used not as a Macro but a normal lens (which my non-L USM 100 Macro was quite poor for). If they could make 135 f2 lighter version with AF for Sony and price is slightly under Sigma 135 /1.8 and obviously Batis 135 2.8 it could sell like hotcakes. USM works so quickly and accurately, it puts my 24-70/f2.8L to shame. The image is a 90-second exposure at ISO 400 using a Canon EOS 60Da. However, for $15 I also bought an old Tamron Adaptall 2, 135 mm f2.5. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. An update to the Mini 11, the new camera adds parallax correction capabilities, automatic flash control and a multi-function twist lens. Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does.
Is Anxiety A Punishment From Allah, Articles C
Is Anxiety A Punishment From Allah, Articles C